Contacto:
Javier De Rivera
@j_derivera
javier@sociologiayredessociales.com-

CC 3.0: Javier De Rivera
Se puede reproducir el contenido citando al autor y el link. -
Subscripción RSS
-
Lista de artículos
- Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales – Call for Papers
- Sobre los SmartPhones: “buenos y malos” usos
- Es un mundo extraño
- Evgeny Morozov: El Engaño de la Red, cómo no liberar el mundo
- Amador Fernández-Savater explicando el 15M
- Sexo Virtual en la era Cyborg
- Conferencia Cultura Digital y Movimientos Sociales
- Techno-Sexual Landscapes – Paisajes Tecno-sexuales
- Richard Stallman, el Software Libre y la Libertad en la Red
- Mediactive de Dan Gillmor, traducido al español
- Entrevista en #CarneCruda sobre el #15O
- Call for Papers: N8 de TEKNOKULTURA
- Call for Articles para el libro: Crítica de los Medios de comunicación 2011 – Medios sociales
- Tecnología y Nuevos movimientos sociales
- Entrevista sobre Redes y movimientos sociales
- #Anonymous: el origen de una cibercultura (4chan/b/)
- Las Batallas por la Verdad
- el sujeto colectivo y la segunda sociología de las redes sociales
- Los problemas de analizar la Sociedad Digital
- Teknokultura: Revista de Cultura digital y Movimientos sociales
Social Media Sociology- Teknokultura. Journal of Digital Culture and Social Movements – Call for Papers
- What’s new in New Media? Discussing Lievrouw’s Alternative and Activist New media
- Evgeny Morozov: The Net Delusion – How not to liberate the world (Book Review)
- Social Media and Social Movements
- Why a Social Media Sociology?
Categorías:
- 1. Teoría de redes sociales (13)
- 2. Comunicación en redes sociales (11)
- 3. Identidad en redes sociales (5)
- Comentarios de libros (1)
- Entrevistas (6)
- Eventos Sociales (11)
- Facts and Figures (1)
- Glosario de términos (4)
- Investigación en redes sociales (5)
- marco teorico (7)
- Movimientos sociales (12)
- Notas de campo y planificación (6)
- Noticas de redes sociales (8)
- Off Topic (5)
- Organización del proyecto (3)
- Reflexiones sobre los social media (21)
Blogs que sigo:
- Comunicación Social 2.0 – Irene Recio
- El Blog de Notas – notas aisladas
- El portal de las Series
- Escritos de Jorge Galindo – politólogo
- Fernando Santamaría – Comunicación y educación
- ICTlogy
- Javier Velilla – Comunicación
- Joan Jimenez – social branding
- Julio Garriga – publicidad y inv. mercados
- Las Blog en punto
- Luis García Fanlo – sociologo
- Marcelo Lacanna – escritor/consultor
- PTQK Blogzine
- Rafael Conde Melguizo – Sociologia
- ReadWriteWeb
- Research on Facebook
- Revista Teknokultura
- Sociodicea – A. Lomeña
- Sofi in the sity
- Victor Gil
Email subscription
You may want to put some text hereGet this Wordpress newsletter widget
for newsletter softwareTags
15M activismo amigos atención atención ilusoria censura comunicacion concepto cultura digital economia economía de la atención Egipto entrevista estudio estudios facebook faceboom hiperconectividad identidad información investigacion libro marco teorico marketing media Medios de comunicación Movimientos sociales proyecto de investigación psicología redes sociales redes sociales de internet reflexión relación revoluciones revolución facebook social media Social Media Networks sociedad digital sociología Teknokultura terminología Turquía twitter violencia web 2.0
Investigación y marketingsitios amigos

Hypothalamus rules – the antidote for SAC
These days, I’ve been thinking a lot about the Stand Alone Complex. I see it as a dysfunction caused by the overuse of abstract reasoning instead of focusing on personal interests and situations. The concept of social justice appears to be the main reason for the Stand Alone Complex.
The subject cannot develop his own identity without social interaction and self-integration in the peer group. So, it is his particular situation what determines the adjusted point of view of the reality. When someone begins to give more importance to his thoughts over his own particular situation, the identity loses its background threatening to unbalance the personality. This triggers a process of isolation of the subject from his own social background, leading him to construct an alternative reality with illusory cultural referents. All this process is called the Stand Alone Complex, and can be replicated via memetical imitation.

Why is this a mental dysfunction and not the correct way of behaving in search for a more ethical society?
The SAC is a mental dysfunction because it represents the over-influence of the neo-cortex over the more basic functions of the brain.
The human brain can be divided in three different levels, also called the three brains. The first one is the hypothalamus, which regulates all the biological functions of the body, the instincts as survival imperatives and reproduction impulses. It’s also known as the reptile brain, because it’s the only one kind of brain that reptiles have.
The second level is the limbic system, also known as the emotional brain or mammal brain. It includes the hypocampus and implies a more developed feeling of the self, with memory storage and a reduced capacity of informational managing. This part of the brain is the reason why mammals can learn and reptiles cannot. The conditional reflex is operated in this area.
The third level is the neo-cortex. It’s present in many developed mammals, but usually it’s considered as the idiosyncrasy of the human being. It gives us the capacity to think and develop complex theories about the world and our place in it.
In the SAC, the subject gets isolated because the world doesn’t match with his own ideals, and he find himself lost in his own thoughts. On the contrary, materialistic individualism or the logic of personal interests are the perfect antidote for the SAC. It means the recognition that the self wants to be accepted and integrated, even thought the world is crazy and the society organization has no rational sense at all.
It doesn’t matter how hard we try to build a perfect ideology of the must be of human life, our hypothalamus (that is the more basic function of ourselves) is going to rule our more basic feelings and motivations. So we can think that we are fighting for Justice or for any other ideal, but our deepest and irrational desire is to get attention and feel stimulated by social interaction.